Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

´Ü¹æ³¶Á¾¼º ¹ý¶û¾Æ¼¼Æ÷Á¾ÀÇ ÀûÃâ¼ú ÈÄ Àç¹ß °æÇâ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

A STUDY ON THE PROGNOSIS AFTER ENUCLEAT10N IN THE UNICYSTIC AMELOBLASTOMA

´ëÇѱ¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 24±Ç 3È£ p.346 ~ 353
Á¤¿µ¼ö, ÀÌÀÇ¿õ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤¿µ¼ö (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾Æ°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀÇ¿õ (  ) - ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract

¥´. °á ·Ð
1990³â 1¿ùºÎÅÍ 1997³â 10¿ù±îÁö ¸¸ 7³â 10°³¿ù°£ ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇк´¿ø ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü
°ú¿¡ ³»¿øÇÏ¿© Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´Ü¹æ³¶Á¾¼º ¹ý¶û¾Æ¼¼Æ÷Á¾À¸·Î Áø´Ü ¹Þ°í ¼úÈÄ 6°³¿ùÀÌ»ó ÃßÀû
°üÂûÇÏ¿´´ø ȯÀÚ 22¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿© À̵é ȯÀÚµéÀÇ ÀÓ»óº´»ó±â·Ï, ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø, Á¶Á÷º´¸®
ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ß µîÀ» Âü°íÇÏ¿© ȯÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ¼Ò, ¿¬·É ¹× ¼ºº° ºóµµ,ºÎÀ§º° ºóµµ, ¹æ»ç¼±»çÁø ¼Ò°ß,Á¶
Á÷ÇÐÀû À¯Çü, ÃßÀû°üÂû ±â°£ ¹× Àç¹ßÀ² µî¿¡ ´ëÇØ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© Á¶Á÷º´¸®ÇÐÀû À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ Àç¹ß
À² ¹× ÀÓ»ó ¾çÅ¿¡ °üÇØ ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½ÀÇ °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ȯÀÚÀÇ ÁÖ¼Ò´Â ¹«Å뼺 ¹× ÅëÁõ¼º Á¾Ã¢ÀÌ 19·Ê(86.4%)·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾Ò°í, °¨°¢ ÀÌ»óÀÌ 2·Ê
(9.1%), ¹è³óÀÌ 1·Ê(4.5%)ÀÇ ¼ø À̾ú´Ù.
2. ¿¬·Éº° ºóµµ´Â 10´ë°¡ 12·Ê(54.5%)·Î °¡Àå ¸¹¾ÒÀ¸¸ç 20´ë°¡ 8·Ê(36.5%)·Î 10´ë¿Í 20´ë
°¡ ÃÑ 22·Ê Áß 20·Ê(91%)¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú°í, Æò±Õ ¿¬·ÉÀº 20.5¼¼¿´´Ù. ÇÑÆí, ¼ºº°ÀÇ ºñÀ²Àº
³²¼ºÀÌ 13·Ê·Î ¿©¼ºÀÇ 9·Ê¿¡ ºñÇØ 1.4 : 1·Î ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
3. ºÎÀ§º° ºóµµ´Â 22·Ê ¸ðµÎ ÇϾǰñ¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç °ñüºÎ°¡ 15·Ê (68.2%)·Î °¡Àå È£
¹ßÇÏ¿´°í, »óÇàÁöºÎ°¡ 6·Ê (27.2%), Á¤Áߺΰ¡ 1·Ê (4.5%) ¼øÀÌ ¾ú´Ù.
4. ¹æ»ç¼±ÇÐÀû ¼Ò°ßÀº ÃÑ 22·Ê Áß ´Ü¹æ¼ºÀÌ 18·Ê(81.8%)·Î ´Ù¹æ¼º 4·Ê(182%)¿¡ ºñÇØ ºó¹ß
ÇÏ¿´°í ¸Åº¹Ä¡¿Í ¿¬°üµÈ °æ¿ì´Â ´Ù¹æ¼º 18·Ê Áß 15·Ê(83.3%), ´Ù¹æ¼º 4·Ê Áß 3·Ê(75%)
¸¦ º¸¿´´Ù.
5. AckermannµîÀÇ Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû ºÐ·ù¹ý¿¡ µû¸¥ À¯ÇüÀº °áüÁ¶Á÷ ħÀÔÇüÀÌ 14·Ê(8.6%), ³¶Á¾
°­Çü, ¸Á»óÇüÀÌ °¢°¢ 4·Ê(183%) ¾¿À̾ú´Ù.
6. °üÂû ±â°£Àº ÀûÃâ¼úÈÄ 6°³¿ù¿¡¼­ 8³â ¹Ì¸¸À¸·Î Æò±Õ 3.4³âÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç,ÃÑ 22·Ê Áß Àç¹ßµÈ
1·Ê(L5%)´Â °áüÁ¶Á÷ ħÀÔÇüÀÌ ¾ú´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼ºÀûÀ» ±Ù°Å·Î ÇÏ¿© ȯÀÚÀÇ ±â´É, ½É¹Ì¼º, Á¤½ÅÀûÀÎ ¹®Á¦ µîÀ» °í·ÁÇÒ ¶§ Á¶Á÷ÇÐÀû
À¯Çü¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ º¸Á¸Àû Ä¡·á¹ýÀÎ ÀûÃâ¼úÀÌ ÀûÇÕÇÏ´Ù°í ÆǴܵǾú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
Since the apparent development of ameloblastoma in the wall of a dentigerous cyst
was first described by Cahn in 1933. many colleagues have reported the ameloblastoma
originated odontogenic cyst. In 1970. Vickers and Gorlin published specific histologic
criterria of the ameloblastoma originated odontogenic cyst, and in 1977, robinson and
Martinez referred to this variant as unicystic ameloblastoma in which the tesponse to
encleation or curettage was found to be fanorable with low recurrence rate. This lesion
was divided into 3 Groups (luminal, plexiform, connective tissue invasion type) according
to the histopathologic feature by Ackeymann etc. in 1988, and they recommended radical
treatment In connective tlssue Invasion type.
Conservative enucleation and currettge have been reported the choice treatment
compared with conventional ameloblastoma. which has represented low recurrent rate,
but the study on the prognosis after enucletion according to the histologic subtypes of
the unlcystic ameloblastoma has been rare.
This study is to invested the recurrence and clinical features of 22 ameloblastomas
which have been experienced by enucleation as trearment method from January 1990 to
October 1997 in Dental College Hospital of Yonsei University. The results obtained are
as follows.
1. The most common patients complains were painless or painful swelling of jaw(19
cases, 86.4%). dysthesia (2 cases, 9.1%), pus discharge (1 case, 4.5%) were next In
order.
2. The most frequent age was 2nd decade which was 12 cases(54.5%), and next
frequent age was 3rd decade which was 8 cases (36.5%). The average age was 20.5
years old, and sex ratio was 1.4:1 (male female).
3. All 22 cases were developed in the mandible, and body area occupied 15cases
(68.2%), ramus area was 6 Cases(27.2%) and symphysis area was 1 case (4.5%).
4. Radiographically, unilocular type was 81.8%, and the cases related with impacted
tooth were ular type and 3 cases (75%) In multllocular type.
5. According to histologic subtype by Ackermann's classification, luminal type and
were 4case(18.2%) respeclively, connective tissue type was 12 cases (63.6%).
6. Average follow-up period was 3.4 years, and the recurrence was 1 case(4.5%) of
total 22 cases, which was connective tissue Invasion type (7.14%) histologically.
Based on the above results, when patient's function, esthetics, and paychologic factor
are considered,the enucleation was adequarte primary treatment modality In any
histologic type of the unlcystic ameloblastoma

Å°¿öµå

Unlcystic Ameloblastoma; Histologic subtype; Enucleation; Recurrence rate;

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed